On 4/20/20 11:41 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> >> I disagree. There are multiple master devices and no reason to have a >> LAG specific get_slave. > > Do you have usecase for any other non-lag master type device? > Note the ndo name can change whenever needed. I think the name should > reflect the usage. > right now, no. But nothing about the current need is LAG specific, so don't make it seem like it is LAG specific with the name.
