Re: [PATCH for-next v2 2/3] RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor device add/remove functionalities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>  static void bnxt_re_stop_irq(void *handle)
> @@ -1317,7 +1320,37 @@ static void bnxt_re_query_hwrm_intf_version(struct bnxt_re_dev *rdev)
>  		le16_to_cpu(resp.hwrm_intf_patch);
>  }
>  
> -static void bnxt_re_ib_unreg(struct bnxt_re_dev *rdev)
> +static void bnxt_re_ib_uninit(struct bnxt_re_dev *rdev)
> +{
> +	/* Cleanup ib dev */
> +	if (test_bit(BNXT_RE_FLAG_IBDEV_REGISTERED, &rdev->flags)) {
> +		ib_unregister_device(&rdev->ibdev);
> +		clear_bit(BNXT_RE_FLAG_IBDEV_REGISTERED, &rdev->flags);
> +	}

The reason ib_unregister_device_queued exists is because you can't
call unregistration while holding RTNL.

>  	case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
> @@ -1704,9 +1727,8 @@ static int bnxt_re_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *notifier,
>  		 */
>  		if (atomic_read(&rdev->sched_count) > 0)
>  			goto exit;
> -		bnxt_re_ib_unreg(rdev);
> -		bnxt_re_remove_one(rdev);
> -		bnxt_re_dev_unreg(rdev);
> +		bnxt_re_ib_uninit(rdev);
> +		bnxt_re_remove_device(rdev);
>  		break;

ie here.

This *must* simply be a call to ib_unregister_device_queued() and all
this other stuff has to go into the dealloc.

As written this is all kinds of deadlocking and racy

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux