On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 04:59:11PM -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: > > I would actively block an attempt to try and do an end-run around > > upstream like this. rdma-core is supposed to be the defacto > > configuration, not be modified randomly by distros as before. > > No but users should be free to name their devices how they want should they > not? Isn't that exactly why PSM is broken? These days I can do $ rdma link add hfi1_0 type siw netdev eth0 and PSM will become very confused. This is why keying off the device name was *never* OK. > > Why isn't psm keying off it's own chardev anyhow? There should be back > > links to the RDMA device in sysfs from there. > > No arguments here. No sense in going down this road though at this point in > the game. I'm not sure what these means? Are you saying you won't be fixing PSM? Why? Jason
