On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 10:26:22AM -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: > On 2/4/2020 9:56 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 08:55:20AM -0500, Goldman, Adam wrote: > > > From: "Goldman, Adam" <adam.goldman@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > PSM2 will not run with recent rdma-core releases. Several tools and > > > libraries like PSM2, require the hfi1 name to be present. > > > > > > Recent rdma-core releases added a new feature to rename kernel devices, > > > but the default configuration will not work with hfi1 fabrics. > > > > > > Related opa-psm2 github issue: > > > https://github.com/intel/opa-psm2/issues/43 > > > > Why don't you fix opa-psm2 and add required rdma-core version > > checks inside packaging spec files, like we have inside > > redhat/rdma-core.spec? > > > > Thanks > > > > This is the way PSM has operated from day 1. It has been broken by this > rename stuff. Clearly not everyone is fan, [1] [2] of the rename. Of course that not everyone will be happy, it is a nature of progress :). > > Seems to me like we should revert back to the original behavior. However in > lieu of that let HW vendors opt out like what this patch from Adam does. > > [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-rdma&m=158082841016117&w=2 > [2] https://marc.info/?l=linux-rdma&m=158082569215149&w=2 > > -Denny
