On 08/01/2020 20:05, Yishai Hadas wrote: > From: Michael Guralnik <michaelgur@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > As part of adding a range of optional access flags that drivers need to > be able to accept, mask this range inside efa driver. > This will prevent the driver from failing when an access flag from > that range is passed. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Guralnik <michaelgur@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/infiniband/hw/efa/efa_verbs.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/efa/efa_verbs.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/efa/efa_verbs.c > index 50c2257..b6b936c 100644 > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/efa/efa_verbs.c > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/efa/efa_verbs.c > @@ -1370,6 +1370,7 @@ struct ib_mr *efa_reg_mr(struct ib_pd *ibpd, u64 start, u64 length, > IB_ACCESS_LOCAL_WRITE | > (is_rdma_read_cap(dev) ? IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_READ : 0); > > + access_flags &= ~IB_UVERBS_ACCESS_OPTIONAL_RANGE; Hi Yishai, access_flags should be masked with IB_ACCESS_OPTIONAL instead of IB_UVERBS_ACCESS_OPTIONAL_RANGE. Also, could you please make sure to CC me to future EFA patches?
