On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 11:37:47AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > +/* Table 106 REQ Message Contents */ > +#define CM_REQ_LOCAL_COMM_ID CM_FIELD32_LOC(struct cm_req_msg, 0, 32) > +#define CM_REQ_SERVICE_ID CM_FIELD64_LOC(struct cm_req_msg, 8, 64) > +#define CM_REQ_LOCAL_CA_GUID CM_FIELD64_LOC(struct cm_req_msg, 16, 64) > +#define CM_REQ_LOCAL_Q_KEY CM_FIELD32_LOC(struct cm_req_msg, 28, 32) > +#define CM_REQ_LOCAL_QPN CM_FIELD32_LOC(struct cm_req_msg, 32, 24) > +#define CM_REQ_RESPONDED_RESOURCES CM_FIELD8_LOC(struct cm_req_msg, 35, 8) RESPONDER not RESPONDED > +#define CM_REQ_PRIMARY_LOCAL_PORT_LID CM_FIELD16_LOC(struct cm_req_msg, 52, 16) > +#define CM_REQ_PRIMARY_REMOTE_PORT_LID CM_FIELD16_LOC(struct cm_req_msg, 54, 16) > +#define CM_REQ_PRIMARY_LOCAL_PORT_GID CM_FIELD_MLOC(struct cm_req_msg, 56, 128) > +#define CM_REQ_PRIMARY_REMOTE_PORT_GID CM_FIELD_MLOC(struct cm_req_msg, 72, 128) > +#define CM_REQ_PRIMARY_FLOW_LABEL CM_FIELD32_LOC(struct cm_req_msg, 88, 20) > +#define CM_REQ_PRIMARY_PACKET_RATE CM_FIELD_BLOC(struct cm_req_msg, 91, 2, 2) This field is 6 bits wide, not two. This is the only mistake in the field layouts. Jason
