Re: [PATCH v5 00/25] RTRS (former IBTRS) rdma transport library and the corresponding RNBD (former IBNBD) rdma network block device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 04:50:44PM +0100, Jack Wang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> here is V5 of the RTRS (former IBTRS) rdma transport library and the
> corresponding RNBD (former IBNBD) rdma network block device.
>
> Main changes are the following:
> 1. Fix the security problem pointed out by Jason
> 2. Implement code-style/readability/API/etc suggestions by Bart van Assche
> 3. Rename IBTRS and IBNBD to RTRS and RNBD accordingly
> 4. Fileio mode support in rnbd-srv has been removed.
>
> The main functional change is a fix for the security problem pointed out by
> Jason and discussed both on the mailing list and during the last LPC RDMA MC 2019.
> On the server side we now invalidate in RTRS each rdma buffer before we hand it
> over to RNBD server and in turn to the block layer. A new rkey is generated and
> registered for the buffer after it returns back from the block layer and RNBD
> server. The new rkey is sent back to the client along with the IO result.
> The procedure is the default behaviour of the driver. This invalidation and
> registration on each IO causes performance drop of up to 20%. A user of the
> driver may choose to load the modules with this mechanism switched off
> (always_invalidate=N), if he understands and can take the risk of a malicious
> client being able to corrupt memory of a server it is connected to. This might
> be a reasonable option in a scenario where all the clients and all the servers
> are located within a secure datacenter.
>
> Huge thanks to Bart van Assche for the very detailed review of both RNBD and
> RTRS. These included suggestions for style fixes, better readability and
> documentation, code simplifications, eliminating usage of deprecated APIs,
> too many to name.
>
> The transport library and the network block device using it have been renamed to
> RTRS and RNBD accordingly in order to reflect the fact that they are based on
> the rdma subsystem and not bound to InfiniBand only.
>
> Fileio mode support in rnbd-server is not so efficent as pointed out by Bart,
> and we can use loop device in between if there is need, hence we just
> removed the fileio mode support.

Thanks for pushing the code forward.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux