On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 04:19:15PM -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: > The first two patches I wouldn't ordinarily have sent for -rc but I noticed we > did this in the previous -rc post, add an API because we use it in the next fix. > That's what the first two patches here do. It's understandable if you are > skeptical that those are OK for -rc and in which case you can drop and we can > send for next. The only one that looks RC worthy to me is: > Kaike Wan (1): > IB/hfi1: Don't cancel unused work item > > Mike Marciniszyn (2): > IB/hfi1: Add accessor API routines to access context members > IB/rdmavt: Correct comments in rdmavt_qp.h header How is correcting comments a needed fix? Jason
