Re: [PATCH] rdma-core: Recognize IBV_DEVICE_LOCAL_DMA_LKEY in ibv_devinfo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 02:32:31PM -0500, Andrew Boyer wrote:
> 
> > On Nov 25, 2019, at 12:56 PM, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 07:22:37AM -0800, Andrew Boyer wrote:
> >> This bit is defined in the kernel but not displayed by ibv_devinfo.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Boyer <aboyer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> libibverbs/examples/devinfo.c | 3 +++
> >> libibverbs/verbs.h            | 1 +
> >> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/libibverbs/examples/devinfo.c b/libibverbs/examples/devinfo.c
> >> index bf53eac2..e3210f6e 100644
> >> +++ b/libibverbs/examples/devinfo.c
> >> @@ -220,6 +220,7 @@ static void print_device_cap_flags(uint32_t dev_cap_flags)
> >> 				   IBV_DEVICE_RC_RNR_NAK_GEN |
> >> 				   IBV_DEVICE_SRQ_RESIZE |
> >> 				   IBV_DEVICE_N_NOTIFY_CQ |
> >> +				   IBV_DEVICE_LOCAL_DMA_LKEY |
> >> 				   IBV_DEVICE_MEM_WINDOW |
> >> 				   IBV_DEVICE_UD_IP_CSUM |
> >> 				   IBV_DEVICE_XRC |
> >> @@ -260,6 +261,8 @@ static void print_device_cap_flags(uint32_t dev_cap_flags)
> >> 		printf("\t\t\t\t\tSRQ_RESIZE\n");
> >> 	if (dev_cap_flags & IBV_DEVICE_N_NOTIFY_CQ)
> >> 		printf("\t\t\t\t\tN_NOTIFY_CQ\n");
> >> +	if (dev_cap_flags & IBV_DEVICE_LOCAL_DMA_LKEY)
> >> +		printf("\t\t\t\t\tLOCAL_DMA_LKEY\n");
> >> 	if (dev_cap_flags & IBV_DEVICE_MEM_WINDOW)
> >> 		printf("\t\t\t\t\tMEM_WINDOW\n");
> >> 	if (dev_cap_flags & IBV_DEVICE_UD_IP_CSUM)
> >> diff --git a/libibverbs/verbs.h b/libibverbs/verbs.h
> >> index 7b8d4310..81e5812c 100644
> >> +++ b/libibverbs/verbs.h
> >> @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ enum ibv_device_cap_flags {
> >> 	IBV_DEVICE_RC_RNR_NAK_GEN	= 1 << 12,
> >> 	IBV_DEVICE_SRQ_RESIZE		= 1 << 13,
> >> 	IBV_DEVICE_N_NOTIFY_CQ		= 1 << 14,
> >> +	IBV_DEVICE_LOCAL_DMA_LKEY	= 1 << 15,
> >> 	IBV_DEVICE_MEM_WINDOW           = 1 << 17,
> >> 	IBV_DEVICE_UD_IP_CSUM		= 1 << 18,
> >> 	IBV_DEVICE_XRC			= 1 << 20,
> > 
> > This flag really only has meaning for the kernel, it should come out
> > of the uapi at all.
> > 
> > It is a mistake that kernel internal bits have been mixed in with
> > userspace bits.
> > 
> > Jason
> 
> Isn’t there value in having the userspace tools tell the user about
> a device’s in-kernel capabilities?

Sure, but that is more a rdmatool thing, not uverbs

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux