On 11/21/19 12:08 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:13:36PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
+static int pin_goldfish_pages(unsigned long first_page,
+ unsigned long last_page,
+ unsigned int last_page_size,
+ int is_write,
+ struct page *pages[MAX_BUFFERS_PER_COMMAND],
+ unsigned int *iter_last_page_size)
Why not goldfish_pin_pages? Normally we put the module / subsystem
in front.
Heh, is that how it's supposed to go? Sure, I'll change it. :)
Also can we get this queued up for 5.5 to get some trivial changes
out of the way?
Is that a question to Andrew, or a request for me to send this as a
separate patch email (or both)?
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
