Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 05:29:56PM CET, parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Friday, November 8, 2019 10:23 AM
>> To: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>> kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Saeed Mahameed
>> <saeedm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; kwankhede@xxxxxxxxxx; leon@xxxxxxxxxx;
>> cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx; Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-
>> rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Vu Pham <vuhuong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 06/19] net/mlx5: Add support for mediated
>> devices in switchdev mode
>>
>> Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 05:03:13PM CET, parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> Sent: Friday, November 8, 2019 4:33 AM
>> >> To: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> Cc: alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>> >> kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Saeed Mahameed
>> >> <saeedm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; kwankhede@xxxxxxxxxx; leon@xxxxxxxxxx;
>> >> cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx; Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-
>> >> rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Vu Pham <vuhuong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 06/19] net/mlx5: Add support for
>> >> mediated devices in switchdev mode
>> >>
>> >> Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 05:08:21PM CET, parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> >> >From: Vu Pham <vuhuong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>
>> >> [...]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >+static ssize_t
>> >> >+max_mdevs_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct device *dev, char *buf) {
>> >> >+ struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>> >> >+ struct mlx5_core_dev *coredev;
>> >> >+ struct mlx5_mdev_table *table;
>> >> >+ u16 max_sfs;
>> >> >+
>> >> >+ coredev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> >> >+ table = coredev->priv.eswitch->mdev_table;
>> >> >+ max_sfs = mlx5_core_max_sfs(coredev, &table->sf_table);
>> >> >+
>> >> >+ return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", max_sfs); } static
>> >> >+MDEV_TYPE_ATTR_RO(max_mdevs);
>> >> >+
>> >> >+static ssize_t
>> >> >+available_instances_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct device *dev,
>> >> >+char *buf) {
>> >> >+ struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>> >> >+ struct mlx5_core_dev *coredev;
>> >> >+ struct mlx5_mdev_table *table;
>> >> >+ u16 free_sfs;
>> >> >+
>> >> >+ coredev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> >> >+ table = coredev->priv.eswitch->mdev_table;
>> >> >+ free_sfs = mlx5_get_free_sfs(coredev, &table->sf_table);
>> >> >+ return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", free_sfs); } static
>> >> >+MDEV_TYPE_ATTR_RO(available_instances);
>> >>
>> >> These 2 arbitrary sysfs files are showing resource size/usage for the
>> >> whole eswitch/asic. That is a job for "devlink resource". Please implement
>> that.
>> >>
>> >Jiri,
>> >This series is already too long. I will implement it as follow on. It is already
>> in plan.
>> >However, available_instances file is needed regardless of devlink resource,
>> as its read by the userspace for all mdev drivers.
>>
>> If that is the case, why isn't that implemented in mdev code rather than
>> individual drivers? I don't understand.
>>
>It should be. It isn't yet.
>It is similar to how phys_port_name preparation was done in legacy way in individual drivers and later on moved to devlink.c
>So some other time, can move this to mdev core.
Btw, Documentation/driver-api/vfio-mediated-device.rst says:
"[<type-id>], device_api, and available_instances are mandatory attributes
that should be provided by vendor driver."
Why don't you implement "device_api" as well?
>
>
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >> >+
>> >> >+static struct attribute *mdev_dev_attrs[] = {
>> >> >+ &mdev_type_attr_max_mdevs.attr,
>> >> >+ &mdev_type_attr_available_instances.attr,
>> >> >+ NULL,
>> >> >+};
>> >> >+
>> >> >+static struct attribute_group mdev_mgmt_group = {
>> >> >+ .name = "local",
This local name is "type-id"? Why "local?
>> >> >+ .attrs = mdev_dev_attrs,
>> >> >+};
>> >> >+
>> >> >+static struct attribute_group *mlx5_meddev_groups[] = {
>> >> >+ &mdev_mgmt_group,
>> >> >+ NULL,
>> >> >+};
>> >>
>> >> [...]
