From: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx> When eswitch is disabled, vport event handler is unregistered. This unregistration already synchronizes with running EQ event handler in below code flow. mlx5_eswitch_disable() mlx5_eswitch_event_handlers_unregister() mlx5_eq_notifier_unregister() atomic_notifier_chain_unregister() synchronize_rcu() notifier_callchain eswitch_vport_event() queue_work() Additionally vport->enabled flag is set under state_lock during esw_enable_vport() but is not read under state_lock in (a) esw_disable_vport() and (b) under atomic context eswitch_vport_event(). It is also necessary to synchronize with already scheduled vport event. This is already achieved using below sequence. mlx5_eswitch_event_handlers_unregister() [..] flush_workqueue() Hence, (a) Remove vport->enabled check in eswitch_vport_event() which doesn't make any sense. (b) Remove redundant flush_workqueue() on every vport disable. (c) Keep esw_disable_vport() symmetric with esw_enable_vport() for state_lock. Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Vu Pham <vuhuong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c | 14 +++++--------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c index 0dd5e5d5ea35..f15ffb8f5cac 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c @@ -1750,18 +1750,16 @@ static void esw_disable_vport(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, { u16 vport_num = vport->vport; + mutex_lock(&esw->state_lock); if (!vport->enabled) - return; + goto done; esw_debug(esw->dev, "Disabling vport(%d)\n", vport_num); /* Mark this vport as disabled to discard new events */ vport->enabled = false; - /* Wait for current already scheduled events to complete */ - flush_workqueue(esw->work_queue); /* Disable events from this vport */ arm_vport_context_events_cmd(esw->dev, vport->vport, 0); - mutex_lock(&esw->state_lock); /* We don't assume VFs will cleanup after themselves. * Calling vport change handler while vport is disabled will cleanup * the vport resources. @@ -1780,6 +1778,8 @@ static void esw_disable_vport(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, esw_legacy_vport_destroy_drop_counters(vport); } esw->enabled_vports--; + +done: mutex_unlock(&esw->state_lock); } @@ -1793,12 +1793,8 @@ static int eswitch_vport_event(struct notifier_block *nb, vport_num = be16_to_cpu(eqe->data.vport_change.vport_num); vport = mlx5_eswitch_get_vport(esw, vport_num); - if (IS_ERR(vport)) - return NOTIFY_OK; - - if (vport->enabled) + if (!IS_ERR(vport)) queue_work(esw->work_queue, &vport->vport_change_handler); - return NOTIFY_OK; } -- 2.21.0