Re: [PATCH rdma-next] IB/core: Avoid deadlock during netlink message handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 04:26:07PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 10:17:43AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:07:33AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/netlink.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/netlink.c
> > > index 81dbd5f41bed..a3507b8be569 100644
> > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/netlink.c
> > > @@ -42,9 +42,12 @@
> > >  #include <linux/module.h>
> > >  #include "core_priv.h"
> > >
> > > -static DEFINE_MUTEX(rdma_nl_mutex);
> > >  static struct {
> > > -	const struct rdma_nl_cbs   *cb_table;
> > > +	const struct rdma_nl_cbs __rcu *cb_table;
> > > +	/* Synchronizes between ongoing netlink commands and netlink client
> > > +	 * unregistration.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	struct srcu_struct unreg_srcu;
> >
> > A srcu in every index is serious overkill for this. Lets just us a
> > rwsem:
> 
> I liked previous variant more than rwsem, but it is Parav's patch.

Why? srcu is a huge data structure and slow on unregister

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux