On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 05:38:55PM -0700, Qing Huang wrote:
> I know this is not critical. Maybe someone can merge this or fix it with
> other commits? Thanks.
It is not "linux-rdma", but netdev. Your chances will be much higher if
you use get_maintainer.pl and put relevant mailing lists together with
maintainers in TO/CC parts of an email.
Saeed will return from vacation and will take it to his net-next part.
Thanks
>
> On 9/20/19 5:49 PM, Qing Huang wrote:
> > Changed "managerss" to "managers".
> >
> > Fixes: a1b3839ac4a4 ("net/mlx5: E-Switch, Properly refer to the esw manager vport")
> > Signed-off-by: Qing Huang <qing.huang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
> > index 81e03e4..48642b8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
> > @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ static int esw_del_uc_addr(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, struct vport_addr *vaddr)
> > u16 vport = vaddr->vport;
> > int err = 0;
> > - /* Skip mlx5_mpfs_del_mac for eswitch managerss,
> > + /* Skip mlx5_mpfs_del_mac for eswitch managers,
> > * it is already done by its netdev in mlx5e_execute_l2_action
> > */
> > if (!vaddr->mpfs || esw->manager_vport == vport)
