> Subject: Re: [RFC 12/20] RDMA/irdma: Implement device supported verb APIs > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 02:28:41PM +0000, Saleem, Shiraz wrote: > > > Subject: Re: [RFC 12/20] RDMA/irdma: Implement device supported verb > > > APIs > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 07:49:52PM +0000, Saleem, Shiraz wrote: > > > > > Subject: Re: [RFC 12/20] RDMA/irdma: Implement device supported > > > > > verb APIs > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 09:45:11AM -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > > > > > > From: Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > > > Implement device supported verb APIs. The supported APIs vary > > > > > > based on the underlying transport the ibdev is registered as (i.e. > > > > > > iWARP or RoCEv2). > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > --- > > > > > > drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/verbs.c | 4346 > ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/verbs.h | 199 + > > > > > > include/uapi/rdma/rdma_user_ioctl_cmds.h | 1 + > > > > > > 3 files changed, 4546 insertions(+) create mode 100644 > > > > > > drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/verbs.c > > > > > > create mode 100644 drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/verbs.h > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/verbs.c > > > > > > b/drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/verbs.c > > > > > > new file mode 100644 > > > > > > index 000000000000..025c21c722e2 > > > > > > --- /dev/null > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/verbs.c > > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,4346 @@ > > > > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 or Linux-OpenIB > > > > > > +/* Copyright (c) 2019, Intel Corporation. */ > > > > > > > > > > <...> > > > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > + size = sqdepth * sizeof(struct irdma_sq_uk_wr_trk_info) + > > > > > > + (rqdepth << 3); > > > > > > + iwqp->kqp.wrid_mem = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); > > > > > > + if (!iwqp->kqp.wrid_mem) > > > > > > + return -ENOMEM; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + ukinfo->sq_wrtrk_array = (struct irdma_sq_uk_wr_trk_info *) > > > > > > + iwqp->kqp.wrid_mem; > > > > > > + if (!ukinfo->sq_wrtrk_array) > > > > > > + return -ENOMEM; > > > > > > > > > > You are leaking resources here, forgot to do proper error unwinding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > irdma_free_qp_rsrc() will free up that memory in case of an error. > > > > > > I'm talking about kqp.wrid_mem you allocated a couple of lines above > > > and didn't free in case of sq_wrtrk_array allocation failed. > > > > > Yes, I am referring to kqp.wrid_mem as well In case of err, all memory > > resources setup for the QP is freed in the common utility > > irdma_free_qp_rsrc() including the kqp.wrid_mem. > > I see it as an anti-pattern, you have function to setup and it shouldn't return half > initialized state and rely on some other function to clean the mess. > Yes. That makes sense. We ll fix.
