> Subject: Re: [RFC 15/20] RDMA/irdma: Add miscellaneous utility definitions > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 07:49:33PM +0000, Saleem, Shiraz wrote: > > > Subject: Re: [RFC 15/20] RDMA/irdma: Add miscellaneous utility > > > definitions > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 09:45:14AM -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > > > > From: Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Add miscellaneous utility functions and headers. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/osdep.h | 108 ++ > > > > drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/protos.h | 96 ++ > > > > drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/status.h | 70 + > > > > drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/utils.c | 2333 > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 4 files changed, 2607 insertions(+) create mode 100644 > > > > drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/osdep.h > > > > create mode 100644 drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/protos.h > > > > create mode 100644 drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/status.h > > > > create mode 100644 drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/utils.c > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/osdep.h > > > > b/drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/osdep.h > > > > new file mode 100644 > > > > index 000000000000..5885b6fa413d > > > > --- /dev/null > > > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/osdep.h > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ > > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 or Linux-OpenIB */ > > > > +/* Copyright (c) 2019, Intel Corporation. */ > > > > + > > > > +#ifndef IRDMA_OSDEP_H > > > > +#define IRDMA_OSDEP_H > > > > + > > > > +#include <linux/version.h> > > > > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > > > > +#include <linux/vmalloc.h> > > > > +#include <linux/string.h> > > > > +#include <linux/bitops.h> > > > > +#include <linux/pci.h> > > > > +#include <net/tcp.h> > > > > +#include <crypto/hash.h> > > > > +/* get readq/writeq support for 32 bit kernels, use the low-first > > > > +version */ #include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h> > > > > + > > > > +#define MAKEMASK(m, s) ((m) << (s)) > > > > > > It is a little bit over-macro. > > > > > > > Why is this a problem? > > We are not translating any basic kernel construct here. > > See BIT() definition. > OK. And?
