Re: [PATCH for-next] RDMA/hns: Bugfix for flush cqe in case softirq and multi-process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2019/9/10 15:52, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 02:40:20PM +0800, Liuyixian (Eason) wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2019/9/8 16:03, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 08:31:11PM +0800, Weihang Li wrote:
>>>> From: Yixian Liu <liuyixian@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> Hip08 has the feature flush cqe, which help to flush wqe in workqueue
>>>> (sq and rq) when error happened by transmitting producer index with
>>>> mailbox to hardware. Flush cqe is emplemented in post send and recv
>>>> verbs. However, under NVMe cases, these verbs will be called under
>>>> softirq context, and it will lead to following calltrace with
>>>> current driver as mailbox used by flush cqe can go to sleep.
>>>>
>>>> This patch solves this problem by using workqueue to do flush cqe,
>>>
>>> Unbelievable, almost every bug in this driver is solved by introducing
>>> workqueue. You should fix "sleep in flush path" issue and not by adding
>>> new workqueue.
>>>
>> Hi Leon,
>>
>> Thanks for the comment.
>> Up to now, for hip08, only one place use workqueue in hns_roce_hw_v2.c
>> where for irq prints.
> 
> Thanks to our lack of desire to add more workqueues and previous patches
> which removed extra workqueues from the driver.
> 
Thanks, I see.

>>
>> The solution for flush cqe in this patch is as follow:
>> While flush cqe should be implement, the driver should modify qp to error state
>> through mailbox with the newest product index of sq and rq, the hardware then
>> can flush all outstanding wqes in sq and rq.
>>
>> That's the whole mechanism of flush cqe, also is the flush path. We can't
>> change neither mailbox sleep attribute or flush cqe occurred in post send/recv.
>> To avoid the calltrace of flush cqe in post verbs under NVMe softirq,
>> use workqueue for flush cqe seems reasonable.
>>
>> As far as I know, there is no other alternative solution for this situation.
>> I will be very grateful if you reminder me more information.
> 
> ib_drain_rq/ib_drain_sq/ib_drain_qp????
> 
Hi Leon,

I think these interfaces are designed for application to check that all wqes
have been processed by hardware, so called drain or flush. However, it is not
the same as the flush in this patch. The solution in this patch is used
to help the hardware generate flush cqes for outstanding wqes while qp error.

>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Linuxarm mailing list
>>> Linuxarm@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://hulk.huawei.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxarm
>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> .
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux