On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 01:29:27PM +0300, Yuval Shaia wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 05:03:15PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 09:58:42AM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote: > > > > > Add to your list "how does destruction of a MR in 1 process get communicated to > > > the other?" Does the 2nd process just get failed WR's? > > > > IHMO a object that has been shared can no longer be asynchronously > > destroyed. That is the whole point. A lkey/rkey # alone is inherently > > unsafe without also holding a refcount on the MR. > > You meant to say "can no longer be synchronously destroyed", right? No, I mean a another process cannot just rip the rkey out from a process that is using it, asynchronously Jason
