Re: failed armel build of rdma-core 24.0-1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 09:35:59AM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
> On 10/07/2019 22:23, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Benjamin,
> >
> > Can you confirm that something like this fixes these build problems?
> >
> > diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
> > index 07c9c145ff090c..facb45170eacfc 100755
> > --- a/debian/rules
> > +++ b/debian/rules
> > @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ ifneq (,$(filter-out $(COHERENT_DMA_ARCHS),$(DEB_HOST_ARCH)))
> >  		test -e debian/$$package.install.backup || cp debian/$$package.install debian/$$package.install.backup; \
> >  	done
> >  	sed -i '/mlx[45]/d' debian/ibverbs-providers.install debian/libibverbs-dev.install debian/rdma-core.install
> > +	sed -i '/efa/d' debian/ibverbs-providers.install debian/libibverbs-dev.install debian/rdma-core.install
> >  endif
> >  	DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp ninja -C build-deb install
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 11:37:01AM -0000, Debian buildds wrote:
> >>  * Source package: rdma-core
> >>  * Version: 24.0-1
> >>  * Architecture: armel
> >>  * State: failed
> >>  * Suite: sid
> >>  * Builder: antheil.debian.org
> >>  * Build log: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rdma-core&arch=armel&ver=24.0-1&stamp=1562758620&file=log
> >>
> >> Please note that these notifications do not necessarily mean bug reports
> >> in your package but could also be caused by other packages, temporary
> >> uninstallabilities and arch-specific breakages.  A look at the build log
> >> despite this disclaimer would be appreciated however.
>
> Was this error supposed to be reported by travis as well? I'm pretty sure all
> tests passed.

Did you get any build failure email from debian? I didn't.

Thanks



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux