On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 02:29:50PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 12:16:41PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 07:12:50PM -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > > > From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > The RDMA block does not advertise on the PCI bus or any other bus. > > > Thus the ice driver needs to provide access to the RDMA hardware block > > > via a virtual bus; utilize the platform bus to provide this access. > > > > > > This patch initializes the driver to support RDMA as well as creates > > > and registers a platform device for the RDMA driver to register to. At > > > this point the driver is fully initialized to register a platform > > > driver, however, can not yet register as the ops have not been > > > implemented. > > > > I think you need Greg's ack on all this driver stuff - particularly > > that a platform_device is OK. > > A platform_device is almost NEVER ok. > > Don't abuse it, make a real device on a real bus. If you don't have a > real bus and just need to create a device to hang other things off of, > then use the virtual one, that's what it is there for. Ideally I'd like to see all the RDMA drivers that connect to ethernet drivers use some similar scheme. Should it be some generic virtual bus? This is for a PCI device that plugs into multiple subsystems in the kernel, ie it has net driver functionality, rdma functionality, some even have SCSI functionality Jason
