On 6/20/19 3:02 AM, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> @@ -349,9 +350,10 @@ static void print_af_spec(FILE *fp, struct rtattr *af_spec_attr)
>
> static void print_vf_stats64(FILE *fp, struct rtattr *vfstats);
>
> -static void print_vfinfo(FILE *fp, struct rtattr *vfinfo)
> +static void print_vfinfo(struct ifinfomsg *ifi, FILE *fp, struct rtattr *vfinfo)
> {
> struct ifla_vf_mac *vf_mac;
> + struct ifla_vf_broadcast *vf_broadcast;
> struct ifla_vf_tx_rate *vf_tx_rate;
> struct rtattr *vf[IFLA_VF_MAX + 1] = {};
>
> @@ -365,13 +367,43 @@ static void print_vfinfo(FILE *fp, struct rtattr *vfinfo)
> parse_rtattr_nested(vf, IFLA_VF_MAX, vfinfo);
>
> vf_mac = RTA_DATA(vf[IFLA_VF_MAC]);
> + vf_broadcast = RTA_DATA(vf[IFLA_VF_BROADCAST]);
> vf_tx_rate = RTA_DATA(vf[IFLA_VF_TX_RATE]);
>
> print_string(PRINT_FP, NULL, "%s ", _SL_);
> print_int(PRINT_ANY, "vf", "vf %d ", vf_mac->vf);
> - print_string(PRINT_ANY, "mac", "MAC %s",
> - ll_addr_n2a((unsigned char *) &vf_mac->mac,
> - ETH_ALEN, 0, b1, sizeof(b1)));
> +
> + print_string(PRINT_ANY,
> + "link_type",
> + " link/%s ",
> + ll_type_n2a(ifi->ifi_type, b1, sizeof(b1)));
> +
> + print_color_string(PRINT_ANY,
> + COLOR_MAC,
> + "address",
> + "%s",
> + ll_addr_n2a((unsigned char *) &vf_mac->mac,
> + ifi->ifi_type == ARPHRD_ETHER ? ETH_ALEN : INFINIBAND_ALEN,
> + ifi->ifi_type,
> + b1, sizeof(b1)));
> +
> + if (vf[IFLA_VF_BROADCAST]) {
> + if (ifi->ifi_flags&IFF_POINTOPOINT) {
> + print_string(PRINT_FP, NULL, " peer ", NULL);
> + print_bool(PRINT_JSON,
> + "link_pointtopoint", NULL, true);
> + } else {
> + print_string(PRINT_FP, NULL, " brd ", NULL);
> + }
> + print_color_string(PRINT_ANY,
> + COLOR_MAC,
> + "broadcast",
> + "%s",
> + ll_addr_n2a((unsigned char *) &vf_broadcast->broadcast,
> + ifi->ifi_type == ARPHRD_ETHER ? ETH_ALEN : INFINIBAND_ALEN,
> + ifi->ifi_type,
> + b1, sizeof(b1)));
> + }
>
you have a number of alignment problems with the above changes. you can
run checkpatch from the kernel repo on it to verify the coding standards.
