From: Bodong Wang <bodong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Driver is referring to the array index when doing rep initialization,
using vport is confusing as it's normally interpreted as vport number.
This patch doesn't change any functionality.
Signed-off-by: Bodong Wang <bodong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <markb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
index 5124219a31de..f29b9e1f49ae 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
@@ -1399,7 +1399,7 @@ int esw_offloads_init_reps(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw)
struct mlx5_core_dev *dev = esw->dev;
struct mlx5_eswitch_rep *rep;
u8 hw_id[ETH_ALEN], rep_type;
- int vport;
+ int vport_index;
esw->offloads.vport_reps = kcalloc(total_vports,
sizeof(struct mlx5_eswitch_rep),
@@ -1409,8 +1409,8 @@ int esw_offloads_init_reps(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw)
mlx5_query_nic_vport_mac_address(dev, 0, hw_id);
- mlx5_esw_for_all_reps(esw, vport, rep) {
- rep->vport = mlx5_eswitch_index_to_vport_num(esw, vport);
+ mlx5_esw_for_all_reps(esw, vport_index, rep) {
+ rep->vport = mlx5_eswitch_index_to_vport_num(esw, vport_index);
ether_addr_copy(rep->hw_id, hw_id);
for (rep_type = 0; rep_type < NUM_REP_TYPES; rep_type++)
--
2.21.0
