Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 12:53:27PM CEST, leon@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 12:39:40PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 12:15:07PM CEST, leon@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> >On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 12:07:07PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >> Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 07:59:54AM CEST, leon@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> >> >On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 04:32:25AM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > -----Original Message-----
>> >> >> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 5:50 PM
>> >> >> > To: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jason Gunthorpe
>> >> >> > <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> > Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; RDMA mailing list <linux-
>> >> >> > rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Maor Gottlieb <maorg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mark Bloch
>> >> >> > <markb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Petr Vorel
>> >> >> > <pvorel@xxxxxxx>; Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-
>> >> >> > netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> > Subject: [PATCH mlx5-next v1 1/4] net/mlx5: Declare more strictly devlink
>> >> >> > encap mode
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Devlink has UAPI declaration for encap mode, so there is no need to be
>> >> >> > loose on the data get/set by drivers.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Update call sites to use enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode instead of plain
>> >> >> > u8.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Suggested-by: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> > ---
>> >> >> > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h | 8 +++++---
>> >> >> > .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c | 6 ++++--
>> >> >> > include/net/devlink.h | 6 ++++--
>> >> >> > net/core/devlink.c | 6 ++++--
>> >> >> > 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
>> >> >> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
>> >> >> > index ed3fad689ec9..e264dfc64a6e 100644
>> >> >> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
>> >> >> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
>> >> >> > @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ struct mlx5_esw_offload {
>> >> >> > DECLARE_HASHTABLE(mod_hdr_tbl, 8);
>> >> >> > u8 inline_mode;
>> >> >> > u64 num_flows;
>> >> >> > - u8 encap;
>> >> >> > + enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode encap;
>> >> >> > };
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > /* E-Switch MC FDB table hash node */
>> >> >> > @@ -356,9 +356,11 @@ int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_inline_mode_set(struct
>> >> >> > devlink *devlink, u8 mode,
>> >> >> > struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> >> >> > int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_inline_mode_get(struct devlink *devlink, u8
>> >> >> > *mode); int mlx5_eswitch_inline_mode_get(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, int
>> >> >> > nvfs, u8 *mode); -int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_set(struct devlink
>> >> >> > *devlink, u8 encap,
>> >> >> > +int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_set(struct devlink *devlink,
>> >> >> > + enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode
>> >> >> > encap,
>> >> >> > struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> >> >> > -int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_get(struct devlink *devlink, u8
>> >> >> > *encap);
>> >> >> > +int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_get(struct devlink *devlink,
>> >> >> > + enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode
>> >> >> > *encap);
>> >> >> > void *mlx5_eswitch_get_uplink_priv(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, u8
>> >> >> > rep_type);
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > int mlx5_eswitch_add_vlan_action(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, diff --git
>> >> >> > a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
>> >> >> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
>> >> >> > index e09ae27485ee..f1571163143d 100644
>> >> >> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
>> >> >> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
>> >> >> > @@ -2137,7 +2137,8 @@ int mlx5_eswitch_inline_mode_get(struct
>> >> >> > mlx5_eswitch *esw, int nvfs, u8 *mode)
>> >> >> > return 0;
>> >> >> > }
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > -int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_set(struct devlink *devlink, u8
>> >> >> > encap,
>> >> >> > +int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_set(struct devlink *devlink,
>> >> >> > + enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode
>> >> >> > encap,
>> >> >> > struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> >> >> > {
>> >> >> > struct mlx5_core_dev *dev = devlink_priv(devlink); @@ -2186,7
>> >> >> > +2187,8 @@ int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_set(struct devlink
>> >> >> > *devlink, u8 encap,
>> >> >> > return err;
>> >> >> > }
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > -int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_get(struct devlink *devlink, u8
>> >> >> > *encap)
>> >> >> > +int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_get(struct devlink *devlink,
>> >> >> > + enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode
>> >> >> > *encap)
>> >> >> > {
>> >> >> > struct mlx5_core_dev *dev = devlink_priv(devlink);
>> >> >> > struct mlx5_eswitch *esw = dev->priv.eswitch; diff --git
>> >> >> > a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h index
>> >> >> > 1c4adfb4195a..7a34fc586def 100644
>> >> >> > --- a/include/net/devlink.h
>> >> >> > +++ b/include/net/devlink.h
>> >> >> > @@ -530,8 +530,10 @@ struct devlink_ops {
>> >> >> > int (*eswitch_inline_mode_get)(struct devlink *devlink, u8
>> >> >> > *p_inline_mode);
>> >> >> > int (*eswitch_inline_mode_set)(struct devlink *devlink, u8
>> >> >> > inline_mode,
>> >> >> > struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> >> >> > - int (*eswitch_encap_mode_get)(struct devlink *devlink, u8
>> >> >> > *p_encap_mode);
>> >> >> > - int (*eswitch_encap_mode_set)(struct devlink *devlink, u8
>> >> >> > encap_mode,
>> >> >> > + int (*eswitch_encap_mode_get)(struct devlink *devlink,
>> >> >> > + enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode
>> >> >> > *p_encap_mode);
>> >> >> > + int (*eswitch_encap_mode_set)(struct devlink *devlink,
>> >> >> > + enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode
>> >> >> > encap_mode,
>> >> >> > struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> >> >> > int (*info_get)(struct devlink *devlink, struct devlink_info_req *req,
>> >> >> > struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> >> >> > diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c index
>> >> >> > d43bc52b8840..47ae69363b07 100644
>> >> >> > --- a/net/core/devlink.c
>> >> >> > +++ b/net/core/devlink.c
>> >> >> > @@ -1552,7 +1552,8 @@ static int devlink_nl_eswitch_fill(struct sk_buff
>> >> >> > *msg, struct devlink *devlink,
>> >> >> > u32 seq, int flags)
>> >> >> > {
>> >> >> > const struct devlink_ops *ops = devlink->ops;
>> >> >> > - u8 inline_mode, encap_mode;
>> >> >> > + enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode encap_mode;
>> >> >> > + u8 inline_mode;
>> >> >> > void *hdr;
>> >> >> > int err = 0;
>> >> >> > u16 mode;
>> >> >> > @@ -1628,7 +1629,8 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_eswitch_set_doit(struct
>> >> >> > sk_buff *skb, {
>> >> >> > struct devlink *devlink = info->user_ptr[0];
>> >> >> > const struct devlink_ops *ops = devlink->ops;
>> >> >> > - u8 inline_mode, encap_mode;
>> >> >> > + enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode encap_mode;
>> >> >> > + u8 inline_mode;
>> >> >> > int err = 0;
>> >> >> > u16 mode;
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > 2.20.1
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Netdev follows reverse Christmas tree, but otherwise,
>> >> >
>> >> >It was before this patch, if Jiri is ok with that, I'll change this
>> >> >"const struct devlink_ops *ops = devlink->ops;" line while I'll apply
>> >> >this patchset to mlx5-net. If not, I'll leave it as is.
>> >>
>> >> Change to what? I don't follow. The patch looks completely fine to me as
>> >> it is.
>> >
>> >Thanks Jiri,
>> >
>> >Parav mentioned that two lines above my change were already not in Christmas
>> >tree format.
>> >
>> > struct devlink *devlink = info->user_ptr[0];
>> > const struct devlink_ops *ops = devlink->ops;
>>
>> As there is a dependency between those 2 lines, I don't see how you can
>> fix this.
>
>I don't want to do it, but this is possible solution:
>
> const struct devlink_ops *ops:
> struct devlink *devlink;
> ..... extra declarations ....
>
> devlink = info->user_ptr[0];
> ops = devlink->ops;
> ... rest of the code ...
Please don't.
>>
>>
>> >
>> >Thanks
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >> Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >
>> >> >Thanks
>> >> >
>> >> >>
