On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 03:44:37PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This list is always read and written while holding hmm->lock so there is > no need for the confusing _rcu annotations. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <iweiny@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > mm/hmm.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c > index c2fecb3ecb11e1..709d138dd49027 100644 > --- a/mm/hmm.c > +++ b/mm/hmm.c > @@ -911,7 +911,7 @@ int hmm_range_register(struct hmm_range *range, > mutex_lock(&hmm->lock); > > range->hmm = hmm; > - list_add_rcu(&range->list, &hmm->ranges); > + list_add(&range->list, &hmm->ranges); > > /* > * If there are any concurrent notifiers we have to wait for them for > @@ -941,7 +941,7 @@ void hmm_range_unregister(struct hmm_range *range) > return; > > mutex_lock(&hmm->lock); > - list_del_rcu(&range->list); > + list_del(&range->list); > mutex_unlock(&hmm->lock); > > /* Drop reference taken by hmm_range_register() */ > -- > 2.21.0 >
