Re: Difference: VPI verbs API & RDMA_CM verbs API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Leon Romanovksy,
 Could I think it like below? I'm wondering how to use RDMA_CM API to make IB/RoCEv1 device work.
   1) VPI provides lower layer control API for the devices which implement IB/RoCEv1/RoCEv2/iWARP
   2) RDMA_CM use parts of VPI and other library API to make it convenient to use the devices which implement RoCEv2/iWARP
 For exmaple, rdma_get_devices do some extra things e.g. ucma_set_af_ib_support, besides calling ibv_open_device.

B.R.
Changcheng

On 10:48 Mon 03 Jun, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 08:03:04PM +0800, Liu, Changcheng wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >     Does anyone know the difference between “VPI verbs API” & “RDMA_CM verbs API”?
> >     Is there limitation for these two kinds of API to be used for IB/RoCEv1/RoCEv2/iWARP?
> 
> RDMA_CM verbs provide subset of VPI verbs, because they are implemented
> on top of those VPI verbs.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> >
> > B.R.
> > Changcheng



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux