Re: [PATCH for-next v2 3/4] RDMA/nldev: ib_pd can be pointed by multiple ib_ucontext

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 03:25:32PM +0300, Shamir Rabinovitch wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 12:18:40PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:53:20AM +0300, Shamir Rabinovitch wrote:
> > > In shared object model ib_pd can belong to 1 or more ib_ucontext.
> > > Fix the nldev code so it could report multiple context ids.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shamir Rabinovitch <shamir.rabinovitch@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> 
> [...]
> 
> > > +	if (!rdma_is_kernel_res(res)) {
> > > +		pd_context(pd, &pd_context_ids);
> > > +		list_for_each_entry(ctx_id, &pd_context_ids, list) {
> > > +			if (nla_put_u32(msg, RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_CTXN,
> > > +				ctx_id->id))
> > 
> > Did it work? You are overwriting RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_CTXN entry in the
> > loop. You need to add RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_CTX and
> > RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_CTX_ENTRY to include/uapi/rdma_netlink.h and
> > open nested table here (inside of PD) with list of contexts.
> > 
> > > +				goto err;
> > > +		}
> 
> Hi Leon,
> 
> Just to clarify the above nesting...
> 
> Do you expect the below NL attribute nesting in case of shared pd dump?
> 
> RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_CTX
> 	RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_CTX_ENTRY
> 		RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_CTXN #1
> 		RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_CTXN #2
> 		...
> 		RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_CTXN #N
> 
> 
> I tried this and rdmatool reported:
> 
> [root@qemu-fc29 iproute2]# rdma/rdma res show pd dev mlx4_0
> dev mlx4_0 pdn 0 local_dma_lkey 0x8000 users 4 comm [ib_core]
> dev mlx4_0 pdn 1 local_dma_lkey 0x8000 users 4 comm [ib_core]
> error: Operation not supported
> 
> Is this the expected behaviour from unmodified latest rdmatool?
> 
> Thanks

Leon, 

I tried this nesting (which make more sense to me) and results are the
same as above.

RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_CTX
	RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_CTX_ENTRY
		RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_CTXN
	RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_CTX_ENTRY
		RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_CTXN
...

Which is the nesting you expect ?

Is it OK that we get the rdma tool "error: Operation not supported" ?

Thanks



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux