Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] mm/hmm: Various revisions from a locking/code review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/23/19 8:34 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

This patch series arised out of discussions with Jerome when looking at the
ODP changes, particularly informed by use after free races we have already
found and fixed in the ODP code (thanks to syzkaller) working with mmu
notifiers, and the discussion with Ralph on how to resolve the lifetime model.

Overall this brings in a simplified locking scheme and easy to explain
lifetime model:

  If a hmm_range is valid, then the hmm is valid, if a hmm is valid then the mm
  is allocated memory.

  If the mm needs to still be alive (ie to lock the mmap_sem, find a vma, etc)
  then the mmget must be obtained via mmget_not_zero().

Locking of mm->hmm is shifted to use the mmap_sem consistently for all
read/write and unlocked accesses are removed.

The use unlocked reads on 'hmm->dead' are also eliminated in favour of using
standard mmget() locking to prevent the mm from being released. Many of the
debugging checks of !range->hmm and !hmm->mm are dropped in favour of poison -
which is much clearer as to the lifetime intent.

The trailing patches are just some random cleanups I noticed when reviewing
this code.

I expect Jerome & Ralph will have some design notes so this is just RFC, and
it still needs a matching edit to nouveau. It is only compile tested.


Thanks so much for doing this. Jerome has already absorbed these into his
hmm-5.3 branch, along with Ralph's other fixes, so we can start testing,
as well as reviewing, the whole set. We'll have feedback soon.


thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux