Hello, On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 12:50:50PM -0700, Welty, Brian wrote: > There might still be merit in having a 'device mem' cgroup controller. > The resource model at least is then no longer mixed up with host memory. > RDMA community seemed to have some interest in a common controller at > least for device memory aspects. > Thoughts on this? I believe could still reuse the 'struct mem_cgroup' data > structure. There should be some opportunity to reuse charging APIs and > have some nice integration with HMM for charging to device memory, depending > on backing store. Library-ish sharing is fine but in terms of interface, I think it'd be better to keep them separate at least for now. Down the line maybe these resources will interact with each other in a more integrated way but I don't think it's a good idea to try to design and implement resource models for something like that preemptively. Thanks. -- tejun
