Re: [PATCH for-next v6 10/12] RDMA/efa: Add EFA verbs implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03-May-19 15:21, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 12:32:58PM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
>> On 02-May-19 20:47, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 11:46:00AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>>> On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 11:28:40AM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
>>>>> On 01-May-19 19:40, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 01:48:22PM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +int efa_mmap(struct ib_ucontext *ibucontext,
>>>>>>> +	     struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>> +	struct efa_ucontext *ucontext = to_eucontext(ibucontext);
>>>>>>> +	struct efa_dev *dev = to_edev(ibucontext->device);
>>>>>>> +	u64 length = vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start;
>>>>>>> +	u64 key = vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>>>>> +	struct efa_mmap_entry *entry;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +	ibdev_dbg(&dev->ibdev,
>>>>>>> +		  "start %#lx, end %#lx, length = %#llx, key = %#llx\n",
>>>>>>> +		  vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end, length, key);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +	if (length % PAGE_SIZE != 0 || !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) {
>>>>>>> +		ibdev_dbg(&dev->ibdev,
>>>>>>> +			  "length[%#llx] is not page size aligned[%#lx] or VM_SHARED is not set [%#lx]\n",
>>>>>>> +			  length, PAGE_SIZE, vma->vm_flags);
>>>>>>> +		return -EINVAL;
>>>>>>> +	}
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC) {
>>>>>>> +		ibdev_dbg(&dev->ibdev, "Mapping executable pages is not permitted\n");
>>>>>>> +		return -EPERM;
>>>>>>> +	}
>>>>>>> +	vma->vm_flags &= ~VM_MAYEXEC;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also we dropped the MAYEXEC stuff
>>>>>
>>>>> Latest commit that had any MAYEXEC changes is 4eb6ab13b991 ("RDMA: Remove
>>>>> rdma_user_mmap_page"), where MAYEXEC is added not removed.
>>>>> Am I missing a followup patch?
>>>>
>>>> I'm not aware of any.
>>>
>>> It was a mistake it wasn't removed from that commit too.
>>
>> Can you explain please?
> 
> We dropped all the MAYEXEC stuff and that case got missed - it should
> have been dropped too

Why is MAYEXEC not needed?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux