Re: [PATCH rdma-next v1 2/6] RDMA/umem: Add API to find best driver supported page size in an MR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 03:25:26PM +0000, Saleem, Shiraz wrote:
> >Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v1 2/6] RDMA/umem: Add API to find best driver
> >supported page size in an MR
> >
> >On 19-Feb-19 16:57, Shiraz Saleem wrote:
> >> This helper iterates through the SG list to find the best page size to
> >> use from a bitmap of HW supported page sizes. Drivers that support
> >> multiple page sizes, but not mixed pages in an MR can use this API.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
> >> Reviewed-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >I've tested this patch comparing our existing efa_cont_pages() implementation vs
> >ib_umem_find_single_pg_size() running different test suites:
> 
> Thanks for testing!
> 
> >
> >Supported page sizes are anything between 4k to 2G.
> >I'm using page shift to compare results of both functions (ilog2 the return value of
> >ib_umem_find_single_pg_size).
> >
> >When huge pages are disabled, in many cases efa_cont_pages() returns page shift
> >of 13 where ib_umem_find_single_pg_size() returns 12. Didn't see a test where
> >ib_umem_find_single_pg_size() returns anything other than 12 (PAGE_SIZE).
> 
> I wonder if the checks in place to guarantee offset into large page
> align for user-space virt buf and phy buf is downgrading the page
> bit. And that EFA might not need it.

EFA doesn't have actual MRs with virtual addreses, so it probably
doesn't care. 

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux