Re: [RFC/PATCH net-next 0/9] net/dim: Support for multiple implementations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




As we discussed, let's check with RDMA maintainers if it's better to extend alloc_cq API or create alloc_cq_dim API function.

Sagi/Christoph,

how about adding a module param per ULP ? as we use register_always today, create a use_dimm module param for iSER/NVMe-RDMA ?

I would say that its better (and simpler) to do a global sysctl knob for
it. No need for a per-ULP param for a starting point.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux