On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 02:36:10PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 11:18:27AM +0200, Shamir Rabinovitch wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:44:52PM +0200, Shamir Rabinovitch wrote:
> > > This patch set continue the cleanup started with prior series. This
> > > patch set clean the ib_xxx destroy APIs because those APIs do have
> > > ib_udata.
> > >
> > > The final goal of this cleanup is to remove the dependency in the IB
> > > code in the ib_xxx->uobject pointer as step toward shared ib_xxx
> > > objects.
> > >
> > > This series also remove ib_ucontext from functions signature where
> > > ib_udata is available.
> > >
> > > Shamir Rabinovitch (5):
> > > IB/{rdma,core}: ucontext should be set properly for all cmd & ioctl
> > > paths
> > > IB/{core,hw}: pass uverbs_attr_bundle down uobject destroy path
> > > IB/{core,hw,sw}: pass uverbs_attr_bundle down ib_x destroy path
> > > IB:{core,hw}: remove 'uobject->context' dependency in object destroy
> > > APIs
> > > IB/{core,hw,sw}: pass only ib_udata in function prototypes
> > >
[...]
> >
> > Jason, maybe you did not see it because I did not add your mail.
> > Do you want me to re-base on wip/jgg-for-next again and re-send?
>
> We are at the merge window, so this will need to be rebased onto
> 5.1-rc1 in two weeks
>
> Jason
Jason,
5.1-rc1 is merged in to branch 'master'.
Last cycle I was asked by you to work on wip/jgg-for-next .
The wip/jgg-for-next does not have the latest 5.1-rc1 commits.
What branch should I use for this re-base?
Thanks
