Re: [PATCH rdma-next 3/3] RDMA/nldev: Return device protocol

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 02:34:34AM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:

> I know that we are moving toward a single driver supporting more device types
> so having the driver name is probably not the right name but perhaps we should
> just name the devices.

Well, we aren't. That is the entire point. A single struct ib_device
should be one protocol only. The hacky support for a roce/ib multi
port just barely works and doing something crazy like iwarp/roce or
ib/opa is pretty much hopeless/nonsense.

So we will have single PCI devices with multiple ib_device's on them
with different protocols.

Thus we need a single master protocol for the struct ib_device to
generate the name and tell the difference between 'iwarp device on
slot X' and 'roce device on slot X' that exist concurrently.

Having the kernel report the correct device level protocol seems like
the right choice. The only place it doesn't work is mlx4 and mlx4
should really be fixed to not mix protocols. 

Jason




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux