On Mon, 2019-03-11 at 14:33 +-0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: +AD4 - +AF8-s +AD4APQ 0 +ACYAJg +AF8-s +ADw 8 +ACo sizeof(+ACo-d) ? +AF8-s : 0+ADs +AFw +AD4 +- (+AF8-s +AD0APQ 0 +AHwAfA +AF8-s +AD4 0) +ACYAJg +AF8-s +ADw 8 +ACo sizeof(+ACo-d) ? +AF8-s : 0+ADs +AFw Hi Leon, Is there any particular reason why (+AF8-s +AD0APQ 0 +AHwAfA +AF8-s +AD4 0) is used above instead of is+AF8-non+AF8-negative(+AF8-s)? Thanks, Bart.