On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 3:15 AM kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Devesh, > > I love your patch! Yet something to improve: > > [auto build test ERROR on rdma/for-next] > [also build test ERROR on next-20190222] > [cannot apply to v5.0-rc4] > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Devesh-Sharma/bnxt_re-fix-the-regression-due-to-changes-in-alloc_pbl/20190223-033010 > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git for-next > reproduce: > # apt-get install sparse > make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig > make C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > >> drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/ib_verbs.c:806:36: sparse: error: no member 'res' in struct bnxt_re_qp > > vim +/res +806 drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/ib_verbs.c > > 790 > 791 /* Queue Pairs */ > 792 int bnxt_re_destroy_qp(struct ib_qp *ib_qp) > 793 { > 794 struct bnxt_re_qp *qp = container_of(ib_qp, struct bnxt_re_qp, ib_qp); > 795 struct bnxt_re_dev *rdev = qp->rdev; > 796 unsigned int flags; > 797 int rc; > 798 > 799 bnxt_qplib_flush_cqn_wq(&qp->qplib_qp); > 800 rc = bnxt_qplib_destroy_qp(&rdev->qplib_res, &qp->qplib_qp); > 801 if (rc) { > 802 dev_err(rdev_to_dev(rdev), "Failed to destroy HW QP"); > 803 return rc; > 804 } > 805 > > 806 if (!rdma_is_kernel_res(&qp->res)) { > 807 flags = bnxt_re_lock_cqs(qp); > 808 bnxt_qplib_clean_qp(&qp->qplib_qp); > 809 bnxt_re_unlock_cqs(qp, flags); > 810 } > 811 > 812 bnxt_qplib_free_qp_res(&rdev->qplib_res, &qp->qplib_qp); > 813 > 814 if (ib_qp->qp_type == IB_QPT_GSI && rdev->qp1_sqp) { > 815 rc = bnxt_qplib_destroy_ah(&rdev->qplib_res, > 816 &rdev->sqp_ah->qplib_ah, false); > 817 if (rc) { > 818 dev_err(rdev_to_dev(rdev), > 819 "Failed to destroy HW AH for shadow QP"); > 820 return rc; > 821 } > 822 > 823 bnxt_qplib_clean_qp(&qp->qplib_qp); > 824 rc = bnxt_qplib_destroy_qp(&rdev->qplib_res, > 825 &rdev->qp1_sqp->qplib_qp); > 826 if (rc) { > 827 dev_err(rdev_to_dev(rdev), > 828 "Failed to destroy Shadow QP"); > 829 return rc; > 830 } > 831 bnxt_qplib_free_qp_res(&rdev->qplib_res, > 832 &rdev->qp1_sqp->qplib_qp); > 833 mutex_lock(&rdev->qp_lock); > 834 list_del(&rdev->qp1_sqp->list); > 835 atomic_dec(&rdev->qp_count); > 836 mutex_unlock(&rdev->qp_lock); > 837 > 838 kfree(rdev->sqp_ah); > 839 kfree(rdev->qp1_sqp); > 840 rdev->qp1_sqp = NULL; > 841 rdev->sqp_ah = NULL; > 842 } > 843 > 844 if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(qp->rumem)) > 845 ib_umem_release(qp->rumem); > 846 if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(qp->sumem)) > 847 ib_umem_release(qp->sumem); > 848 > 849 mutex_lock(&rdev->qp_lock); > 850 list_del(&qp->list); > 851 atomic_dec(&rdev->qp_count); > 852 mutex_unlock(&rdev->qp_lock); > 853 kfree(qp); > 854 return 0; > 855 } > 856 > > --- > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation Jason, Should I push out V3 to even out kbuild-robot? -Regards Devesh
