Re: [for-next V2] bnxt_re: fix the regression due to changes in alloc_pbl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 07:16:19AM -0500, Devesh Sharma wrote:
> While adding the use of for_each_sg_dma_page iterator for
> Brodcom's rdma driver, there was a regression added in the
> __alloc_pbl path. The change left bnxt_re in DOA state in
> for-next branch.
> 
> Fixing the regression to avoid the host crash when a user
> space object is created. Restricting the unconditional
> access to hwq.pg_arr when hwq is initialized for user space
> objects.
> 
> Fixes: 161ebe2498d4 ("RDMA/bnxt_re: Use for_each_sg_dma_page iterator on umem SGL")
> Reported-by: Gal Pressman <galpress@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Devesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/ib_verbs.c  | 11 +++++++----
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_fp.c  | 20 ++++++--------------
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_res.c |  5 +----
>  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/ib_verbs.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/ib_verbs.c
> index 83bf6f5d..fc65751 100644
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/ib_verbs.c
> @@ -793,8 +793,8 @@ int bnxt_re_destroy_qp(struct ib_qp *ib_qp)
>  {
>  	struct bnxt_re_qp *qp = container_of(ib_qp, struct bnxt_re_qp, ib_qp);
>  	struct bnxt_re_dev *rdev = qp->rdev;
> -	int rc;
>  	unsigned int flags;
> +	int rc;
>  
>  	bnxt_qplib_flush_cqn_wq(&qp->qplib_qp);
>  	rc = bnxt_qplib_destroy_qp(&rdev->qplib_res, &qp->qplib_qp);
> @@ -803,9 +803,12 @@ int bnxt_re_destroy_qp(struct ib_qp *ib_qp)
>  		return rc;
>  	}
>  
> -	flags = bnxt_re_lock_cqs(qp);
> -	bnxt_qplib_clean_qp(&qp->qplib_qp);
> -	bnxt_re_unlock_cqs(qp, flags);
> +	if (!rdma_is_kernel_res(&qp->res)) {

So this doesn't compile:

drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/ib_verbs.c:806:31: error: ‘struct bnxt_re_qp’ has no member named ‘res’; did you mean ‘rdev’?

I fixed it and applied it to for-next, but you should probably test
things.

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux