Re: [PATCH rdma-next v4 8/9] RDMA/nldev: Share with user-space object IDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 01:42:52PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Give to the user space tools unique identifier for PD, MR, CQ and CM_ID
> objects, so they can be able to query on them with .doit callbacks.
> 
> QP .doit is not supported yet, till all drivers will be updated
> to provide their LQPN to be equal to their restrack ID.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c  | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/uapi/rdma/rdma_netlink.h |  9 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c
> index 1fd06ca18829..e460025fbddf 100644
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c
> @@ -107,6 +107,10 @@ static const struct nla_policy nldev_policy[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_MAX] = {
>  	[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_DRIVER_U32]		= { .type = NLA_U32 },
>  	[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_DRIVER_S64]		= { .type = NLA_S64 },
>  	[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_DRIVER_U64]		= { .type = NLA_U64 },
> +	[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_PDN]		= { .type = NLA_U32 },
> +	[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_CQN]               = { .type = NLA_U32 },
> +	[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_MRN]               = { .type = NLA_U32 },
> +	[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_CM_IDN]            = { .type = NLA_U32 },
>  };
>  
>  static int put_driver_name_print_type(struct sk_buff *msg, const char *name,
> @@ -369,6 +373,34 @@ static bool fill_res_entry(struct ib_device *dev, struct sk_buff *msg,
>  	return dev->ops.fill_res_entry(msg, res);
>  }
>  
> +static bool fill_res_ids(struct sk_buff *msg, struct rdma_restrack_entry *res)
> +{
> +	bool ret;
> +
> +	switch (res->type) {
> +	case RDMA_RESTRACK_PD:
> +		ret = nla_put_u32(msg, RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_PDN,
> +				  rdma_res_to_id(res));
> +		break;
> +	case RDMA_RESTRACK_CQ:
> +		ret = nla_put_u32(msg, RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_CQN,
> +				  rdma_res_to_id(res));
> +		break;
> +	case RDMA_RESTRACK_MR:
> +		ret = nla_put_u32(msg, RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_MRN,
> +				  rdma_res_to_id(res));
> +		break;
> +	case RDMA_RESTRACK_CM_ID:
> +		ret = nla_put_u32(msg, RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_CM_IDN,
> +				  rdma_res_to_id(res));
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		ret = true;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static int fill_res_qp_entry(struct sk_buff *msg, bool has_cap_net_admin,
>  			     struct rdma_restrack_entry *res, uint32_t port)
>  {
> @@ -465,6 +497,9 @@ static int fill_res_cm_id_entry(struct sk_buff *msg, bool has_cap_net_admin,
>  		    &cm_id->route.addr.dst_addr))
>  		goto err;
>  
> +	if (fill_res_ids(msg, res))
> +		goto err;

Is there some reason this isn't just written as

  ret = nla_put_u32(msg, RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_CM_IDN, rdma_res_to_id(res));
  if (ret) 
         return ret;

?

I'm confused why we jump to a case statement when every caller in this
patch seems to already know what type it is.

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux