Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] SIW: Request for Comments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:36:49PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 18:21 +0100, bmt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Bernard Metzler <bmt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > This patch set contributes a new version of the SoftiWarp
> > driver, as originally introduced to the list Oct 6th, 2017.
> > SoftiWarp (siw) implements the iWarp RDMA protocol over
> > kernel TCP sockets. The driver integrates with the
> > linux-rdma framework.
> > 
> > For this patch series, we aimed at fixing the main
> > obstacles, which prevented siw acceptance in the past:
> > 
> > 1. siw now uses the recently extended rdma netlink protocol
> >    for adding and removing siw devices. It became the
> >    only way of managing siw devices.
> > 
> > 2. The driver integrates with the currently reviewed
> >    RDMA/IWPM patch series on introducing no port mapping 
> >    requirements. These patches as provided by Steve Wise
> >    are a pre-requisit to run siw in an environment with
> >    active iwpmd.
> > 
> > The code has the following known limitations:
> > 
> > 1. Only IPv4 addresses are supported / no IPv6 support.
> > 
> > 2. All previously flexible module parameters are translated
> >    into const values as defined in siw_main.c. We propose
> >    another extension of the netlink protocol to make those
> >    driver parameters dynamically settable. Ideally, we would
> >    distinguish between link specific and connection specific
> >    parameters.
> > 
> >    Currently, we would like to see the following parameters
> >    settable:
> >    o MPA peer-to-peer mode (boolean on/off)
> >    o MPA CRC (boolean on/off)
> >    o MPA CRC negotiation mode: accept different CRC setting
> >      from peer (boolean on/off)
> >    o TCP_NODELAY to control Nagle settings of TCP socket
> >      (boolean on/off)
> >    o MPA version (0, 1 or 2)
> >    o Zerocopy to let TCP transmit out of application
> >      buffers wr/o copying data (boolean on/off)
> >    o GSO to select Generic Segementation Offload for
> >      larger frames (one frame may span 1 .. n Ethernet
> >      frames, if advertised by TCP socket)
> > 
> >    In principle, all of those parameters could be controlled
> >    per connection. At least, dynamically setting those per
> >    device is highly desirable. Please let's agree on the
> >    most clean solution for that.
> > 
> > We maintain a snapshot of the current code at
> > https://github.com/zrlio/softiwarp-for-linux-rdma.git
> > within branch 'siw-for-rdma-next-nvme-5.0'.
> > This branch is based on the rdma-next tree and additionally
> > includes the latest netlink and portmapper patches from
> > Steve Wise as well as the latest nvme-5.0 code changes from
> > git://git.infradead.org/nvme.git. We tested siw with
> > NVMeF host and target applications and therefor merged
> > with latest nvme development.
> > 
> > The matching siw user library is maintained at
> > https://github.com/zrlio/softiwarp-user-for-linux-rdma.git.
> > It is based on rdma-core, and extended with Steve's patches
> > to both rdma netlink and portmapper. The relevant branch
> > name is 'siw-for-rdma-next'.
> > 
> > 
> > As always, we'd highly appreciate your code review. Thanks
> > very much for your time.
> > 
> > Bernard
> 
> Hi Bernard,
> 
> I'm *thrilled* to see this updated submission at this point in time.  I
> would love nothing more than to see this make the next merge window.

It depends on two big series I haven't sent yet :(

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux