On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:54:04PM -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: > On 1/30/2019 12:21 PM, Doug Ledford wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 21:48 -0800, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: > > > Here is the final set of patches for TID RDMA. Again this is code which was > > > previously submitted but re-organized so as to be easier to review. > > > > > > Similar to how the READ series was organized the patches to build, receive, > > > allocate resources etc are broken out. For details on TID RDMA as a whole > > > again refer to the original cover letter. > > > > > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg66611.html > > > > Help me out here Denny. This appears to be a *monster* submission. Are > > you saying we need all of these patch series to make this work: > > > > Subject: [PATCH for-next 00/17] IB/hfi1: Add TID RDMA Read > > Subject: [PATCH for-next 0/6] IB/hfi1: Add OPFN > > Subject: [PATCH for-next 00/23] IB/hfi1: Add TID RDMA Write > > > > So a total of 46 patches to add this support? And do the series need to > > be in that order? > > Yes it is certainly a monster series. Same code in the end as we submitted > before, Kaike just did a big re-org job on it all so it flows better for > review. The point of the re-org was to get into the standard accepted flow of ~14 patches sent and applicable on their own, not to just re-organize the 50 patches into a different set of 50 patches. Jason
