On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 07:11:42PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:38:35AM -0600, Steve Wise wrote: > > > > On 1/29/2019 1:25 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Adapt mlx5 to share restrack ID instead of local variable. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Hey Leon, By not doing this for the other drivers, are they loosing some > > restrack functionality? Shouldn't all the drivers be changed? > > From functionality point of view, unconverted drivers will work exactly > as they worked before. The main differences between converted and > unconverted are: > 1. Objects which are created by driver won't be visible to user > through rdmatool. I want to see the series organized so that all drivers export all core created objects via netlink. Follow on driver-specific series like this should only be to make the ID #'s used in netlink match some kind of useful driver-specific number, or to remove now duplicate number assignment/tracking code in drivers. Jason
