On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 09:42:15AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> index 6976e17dba68..640ae8a47c73 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ void task_mem(struct seq_file *m, struct mm_struct *mm)
> SEQ_PUT_DEC("VmPeak:\t", hiwater_vm);
> SEQ_PUT_DEC(" kB\nVmSize:\t", total_vm);
> SEQ_PUT_DEC(" kB\nVmLck:\t", mm->locked_vm);
> - SEQ_PUT_DEC(" kB\nVmPin:\t", mm->pinned_vm);
> + SEQ_PUT_DEC(" kB\nVmPin:\t", atomic64_read(&mm->pinned_vm));
> SEQ_PUT_DEC(" kB\nVmHWM:\t", hiwater_rss);
> SEQ_PUT_DEC(" kB\nVmRSS:\t", total_rss);
> SEQ_PUT_DEC(" kB\nRssAnon:\t", anon);
This is signed on 64b but printed as unsigned, so if some bug made pinned_vm go
negative, it would appear as an obviously wrong, gigantic number. Seems ok.
For this patch, you can add
Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@xxxxxxxxxx>
