Re: [PATCH v1] IB/core: Warn if can't pin memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 11:39:54AM +0200, Gal Pressman wrote:
> On 20-Dec-18 11:32, Yuval Shaia wrote:
> > When memory registration is needed for page count which exceeds the
> > allowed lock limit the function exits with an error but no error is
> > printed.
> > Since this is a case that system administrator can fix (rlimit etc) we
> > need to give an alert.
> > This is not a data patch so performance penalty is not a consideration.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v0 -> v1:
> > 	* Accept Leon's comment pr_err to pr_err_ratelimited
> > ---
> >  drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c
> > index c6144df47ea4..73f85cc35418 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c
> > @@ -164,6 +164,8 @@ struct ib_umem *ib_umem_get(struct ib_ucontext *context, unsigned long addr,
> >  	if (check_add_overflow(mm->pinned_vm, npages, &new_pinned) ||
> >  	    (new_pinned > lock_limit && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK))) {
> >  		up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > +		pr_err_ratelimited("%s: Can't pin memory, requested %d, limit %d, ipc_lock off\n",
> > +				   _func__, new_pinned, lock_limit);
> 
> Shouldn't these %d be %lu?

Make sense, missed that, will fix

> 
> >  		ret = -ENOMEM;
> >  		goto out;
> >  	}
> > 
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux