Re: [PATCH rdma-next v5 02/20] RDMA/core: Introduce ib_device_ops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:10:46AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:37:30AM +0200, Yuval Shaia wrote:
> > > > Will it be easier to remove all declarations from ib_device and add new
> > > > member struct ib_device_ops *ops to ib_device this way objective will be
> > > > achieved (code more readable) while still preserving single place of
> > > > declaration?
> > > 
> > > Please take a look on the last patch in this patch set, it removes the functions
> > > within the ib_device and add the ib_device_ops as a member to the ib_device,
> > > this was done to make it easier to review this huge patch set.
> > 
> > Ok, saw it, so wondering why two separate patches where second undo stuff
> > made by first.
> 
> This arrangment has lower LOC changes
> 
> > Anyways, is it possible somehow to include the setting of uverbs_cmd_mask?
> 
> I want to delete this thing, I think we can now, just needs some
> driver auditing (maybe Kamal will do this next :))
>

Maybe :-)
 
> Jason



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux