Re: [for-next PATCH 2/4] RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor rdev init/uninit path and simplifying rtnl_lock usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:06:29AM +0530, Selvin Xavier wrote:
> > If ib_unregister happens the driver must do the remove_device stuff
> > immediately.
> >
> > So, I think you need to use that stuff I sent to Steve. This patch
> > might be an improvement if the above is fixed, maybe, it isn't
> > clear. (and Steve, now that I see the same mess in bnxt, I'm more than
> > convinced that is the right approach to your problem too)
> >
> > However, I'd rather see this as part of a series that comprehensively
> > fixes all of this.
>
> This patch is definitely an improvement on the existing driver
> issues.

I'm happier if we fix all the bug we can see when we start looking at
an issue, rather than just the ones testing hits or something...

> But i am okay to rework with your patch. I will take your patch,
> test it and get back.  Was your patch cut against for-next branch?
> it was not applying cleanly on for-next.

Yes.. It applies on top of e7521d82b33593c9b3ffd1e49a7ea2999ddc2285

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux