RE: [PATCH rdma-rc] IB/core: Don't match bond master filter for closed slaves

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2018 2:55 PM
> To: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Leon Romanovsky
> <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mark Zhang
> <markz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-rc] IB/core: Don't match bond master filter for
> closed slaves
> 
> On Thu, 2018-12-06 at 19:10 +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2018 12:48 PM
> > > To: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mark Zhang
> > > <markz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; RDMA mailing list
> > > <linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-rc] IB/core: Don't match bond master filter
> > > for closed slaves
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 12:19:30PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2018-12-05 at 15:50 +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > > From: Mark Zhang <markz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > > The "modprobe -r mlx4_en" will close bond slaves and in such
> > > > > case the rdma_dev would be NULL, so no match should be returned.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not groking your commit message.  What happens without this
> patch?
> > >
> > > We will see calltrace due to the fact that NULL is passed down the
> > > stack through rdma_is_upper_dev_rcu() upto
> netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu().
> > >
> > I see this patch being sent for -rc which I was not sure when I reviewed.
> > Commit message needs to change as below.
> >
> > When mlx4_en driver is unloaded, and configured to use bond devices,
> get_netdev() callback returns NULL because associated netdev is
> unregistered.
> > Therefore, similar to other filter() routines, fix
> is_upper_ndev_bond_master_filter() to handle NULL netdev.
> > Without this check, a call trace is observed.
> 
> Does it catch a WARN_ON later on, or does it oops?
> 
It is NULL reference oops.

> --
> Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
>     Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B  1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux