On 05-Dec-18 21:23, Hefty, Sean wrote:
>> enum {
>> @@ -119,14 +120,16 @@ enum rdma_transport_type {
>> RDMA_TRANSPORT_IB,
>> RDMA_TRANSPORT_IWARP,
>> RDMA_TRANSPORT_USNIC,
>> - RDMA_TRANSPORT_USNIC_UDP
>> + RDMA_TRANSPORT_USNIC_UDP,
>> + RDMA_TRANSPORT_EFA,
>> };
>>
>> enum rdma_protocol_type {
>> RDMA_PROTOCOL_IB,
>> RDMA_PROTOCOL_IBOE,
>> RDMA_PROTOCOL_IWARP,
>> - RDMA_PROTOCOL_USNIC_UDP
>> + RDMA_PROTOCOL_USNIC_UDP,
>> + RDMA_PROTOCOL_EFA,
>
> EFA is the (marketing?) name of the NIC, not really the transport or protocol. You called the protocol SRD in the cover letter. I'm not sure if that would apply as both the transport or protocol, but it seems a better option than EFA.
We support both SRD and UD, we consider EFA as a family of protocols.
>
> - Sean
>
