Commit 431f6eb3570f ("SUNRPC: Add a label for RPC calls that require
allocation on receive") didn't update similar logic in rpc_rdma.c.
I don't think this is a bug, per-se; the commit just adds more
careful checking for broken upper layer behavior.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
index 89a2db2..c87e0c1 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
@@ -218,11 +218,12 @@ static bool rpcrdma_results_inline(struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt,
ppages = xdrbuf->pages + (xdrbuf->page_base >> PAGE_SHIFT);
page_base = offset_in_page(xdrbuf->page_base);
while (len) {
- if (unlikely(!*ppages)) {
- /* XXX: Certain upper layer operations do
- * not provide receive buffer pages.
- */
- *ppages = alloc_page(GFP_ATOMIC);
+ /* ACL likes to be lazy in allocating pages - ACLs
+ * are small by default but can get huge.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(xdrbuf->flags & XDRBUF_SPARSE_PAGES)) {
+ if (!*ppages)
+ *ppages = alloc_page(GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!*ppages)
return -ENOBUFS;
}
