Re: [PATCH v3 rdma-rc 2/2] RDMA/hns: Add the process of AEQ overflow for hip08

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 03:02:08PM +0800, tanxiaofei wrote:
> Hi Leon
> 
> On 2018/11/25 16:46, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 11:21:50AM +0800, tanxiaofei wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Jason
> >>
> >> On 2018/11/24 4:18, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 03:46:08PM +0800, Yixian Liu wrote:
> >>>> From: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>
> >>>> AEQ overflow will be reported by hardware when too many
> >>>> asynchronous events occured but not be handled in time.
> >>>> Normally, AEQ overflow error is not easy to occur. Once
> >>>> happened, we have to do physical function reset to recover.
> >>>> PF reset is implemented in two steps. Firstly, set reset
> >>>> level with ae_dev->ops->set_default_reset_request.
> >>>> Secondly, run reset with ae_dev->ops->reset_event.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Yixian Liu <liuyixian@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c | 11 +++++++++++
> >>>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c
> >>>> index 3beb152..d02fe04 100644
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c
> >>>> @@ -4565,11 +4565,22 @@ static irqreturn_t hns_roce_v2_msix_interrupt_abn(int irq, void *dev_id)
> >>>>  	int_en = roce_read(hr_dev, ROCEE_VF_ABN_INT_EN_REG);
> >>>>
> >>>>  	if (roce_get_bit(int_st, HNS_ROCE_V2_VF_INT_ST_AEQ_OVERFLOW_S)) {
> >>>> +		struct pci_dev *pdev = hr_dev->pci_dev;
> >>>> +		struct hnae3_ae_dev *ae_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >>>> +		const struct hnae3_ae_ops *ops = ae_dev->ops;
> >>>> +
> >>>>  		dev_err(dev, "AEQ overflow!\n");
> >>>>
> >>>>  		roce_set_bit(int_st, HNS_ROCE_V2_VF_INT_ST_AEQ_OVERFLOW_S, 1);
> >>>>  		roce_write(hr_dev, ROCEE_VF_ABN_INT_ST_REG, int_st);
> >>>>
> >>>> +		/* Set reset level for the following reset_event() call */
> >>>> +		if (ops->set_default_reset_request)
> >>>> +			ops->set_default_reset_request(ae_dev,
> >>>> +						       HNAE3_FUNC_RESET);
> >>>
> >>> This doesn't compile:
> >>>
> >>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c: In function ‘hns_roce_v2_msix_interrupt_abn’:
> >>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c:4578:10: error: ‘const struct hnae3_ae_ops’ has no member named ‘set_default_reset_request’
> >>>    if (ops->set_default_reset_request)
> >>>           ^~
> >>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c:4579:7: error: ‘const struct hnae3_ae_ops’ has no member named ‘set_default_reset_request’
> >>>     ops->set_default_reset_request(ae_dev,
> >>>        ^~
> >>>
> >>> You can't send patches to -rc that don't compile on -rc...
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hi Jason
> >> Sorry that I missed the patch dependency information in commit message.
> >> This patch dependents on the new interface in hns NIC driver
> >> those had been accept by David, the related commit as below:
> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git
> > 
> > You can't send -rc code which depends on -next, only vice versa is possible.
> > 
> 
> OK.I will remake the patch based on for-next branch. thanks.

Use for-rc if you are sending it to -rc

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux