RE: [PATCH rdma-next 03/10] RDMA/uverbs: Replace ib_uverbs_file with uverbs_attr_bundle for write

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>-----Original Message-----
>From: linux-rdma-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-rdma-
>owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Leon Romanovsky
>Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 3:11 AM
>To: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jason Gunthorpe
><jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; RDMA mailing list <linux-
>rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: [PATCH rdma-next 03/10] RDMA/uverbs: Replace ib_uverbs_file with
>uverbs_attr_bundle for write
>
>From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>Now that we can add meta-data to the description of write() methods we
>need to pass the uverbs_attr_bundle into all write based handlers so
>future patches can use it as a container for any new data transferred out
>of the core.
>
>This is the first step to bringing the write() and ioctl() methods to a
>common interface signature.
>
>This is a simple search/replace, and we push the attr down into the uobj
>and other APIs to keep changes minimal.
>
>Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>---
> drivers/infiniband/core/rdma_core.c   |  13 +-
> drivers/infiniband/core/rdma_core.h   |   8 +-
> drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c  | 301 +++++++++++++-------------
> drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c |  12 +-
> drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_uapi.c |   4 +-
> drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/devx.c     |   2 +-
> include/rdma/ib_verbs.h               |   2 +-
> include/rdma/uverbs_ioctl.h           |  10 +-
> include/rdma/uverbs_std_types.h       |  48 ++--
> 9 files changed, 208 insertions(+), 192 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/rdma_core.c
>b/drivers/infiniband/core/rdma_core.c
>index 752a55c6bdce..cf671a643d4c 100644
>--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/rdma_core.c
>+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/rdma_core.c
>@@ -224,12 +224,14 @@ int uobj_destroy(struct ib_uobject *uobj)
>  * uverbs_put_destroy.
>  */
> struct ib_uobject *__uobj_get_destroy(const struct uverbs_api_object *obj,
>-				      u32 id, struct ib_uverbs_file *ufile)
>+				      u32 id,
>+				      const struct uverbs_attr_bundle *attrs)
> {
> 	struct ib_uobject *uobj;
> 	int ret;
>
>-	uobj = rdma_lookup_get_uobject(obj, ufile, id,
>UVERBS_LOOKUP_DESTROY);
>+	uobj = rdma_lookup_get_uobject(obj, attrs->ufile, id,
>+				       UVERBS_LOOKUP_DESTROY);

Is there a reason that you didn't push attrs into rdma_lookup_get_uobject()?

Reviewed-by: Mike Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@xxxxxxxxx>

Mike




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux