在 2018/11/19 1:53, Leon Romanovsky 写道:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 09:09:18PM +0800, fanghao (A) wrote:
在 2018/11/13 3:25, Leon Romanovsky 写道:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 12:11:46PM +0000, tiantao (H) wrote:
Hi Leon:
We want to make a debug tool first. Can we use the debugfs as the mlx for now? on the other hand, we will focus on rdmatool and do our best effort on it as possible as we can.
We are in slow process of removing debugfs from our driver in favour of
rdmatool/devlink, and mlx debugfs is not the best source of inspiration
as a debug tool.
Regarding rdmatool, it seems like all the needed pieces already exist
thanks to Steve's work (e.g. vendor specific information).
Hi Leon:
Thanks a lot for your reply. We will consider using the rdmatool
to track information/resources.
But we also want to configure/read some specific parameters,
we found that rdmatool dose not support configuration untill now.
e.g.
$ echo N >irq_coalesce_timeout
$ cat irq_coalesce_timeout
As sysfs is not suggested to be used, does rdmatool have the plan to support
the configuration? Maybe I missed some important information.
Yes, this part wasn't implemented yet and some extra works is required.
The idea is to send the same "name" as was declared by your driver.
It's very expected. I also noticed another new unified API
interface named rdma_set_device_sysfs_group(), could it be a temporary option?
Thanks
Thanks
Thanks
